RegReview: regulatory intelligence with a source trail.
Monitor regulatory sources, compare changes and turn confirmed text into structured, reviewable obligations.
RegReview turns regulatory source material into a governed, searchable obligations library. It helps compliance and legal teams monitor sources, compare versions, extract requirements, assess applicability and route material changes to the people who own the response.
What RegReview is for
Regulatory change often begins in disconnected portals, newsletters, PDFs and spreadsheets. Teams spend time finding the authoritative text, checking what changed and deciding whether it matters before implementation can even begin. RegReview creates one controlled intake and review process around those decisions.
Core workflow
1. Monitor the sources that matter
Organize regulatory sources by jurisdiction, regulator, topic, business line and entity. Preserve the source URL, publication date, effective date and version so reviewers know which text they assessed.
2. Compare regulatory versions
Surface additions, deletions and amended language side by side. Reviewers can focus on the passages that changed instead of rereading an entire instrument.
3. Structure obligations with source traceability
Break source text into reviewable requirements while retaining a link to the originating article, paragraph or page. AI assists with the first pass; qualified reviewers confirm the interpretation and applicability.
4. Assess impact and assign ownership
Connect a change to affected entities, products, processes, policies and owners. Record why a requirement applies, does not apply or requires further review.
5. Publish a controlled change record
Preserve decisions, comments, approvals and dates. Send confirmed obligations to RegMatcher for policy, control and evidence mapping.
Outputs your team can reuse
- A current, jurisdiction-mapped regulatory library.
- Version comparisons with the changed language highlighted.
- Source-linked obligations with reviewer status and applicability.
- Impact assessments connected to accountable owners.
- Searchable decisions and customizable regulatory digests.
Users, inputs and outputs
| Dimension | RegReview implementation scope |
|---|---|
| Primary users | Regulatory change, compliance, legal, risk, business-line and product owners |
| Inputs | Agreed regulator sources, publications, controlled PDFs or web pages, jurisdiction and entity profiles, taxonomy and reviewer rules |
| Outputs | Source records, version differences, candidate obligations, applicability decisions, impact records, owners, comments and approvals |
| Handoff | Confirmed obligations pass to RegMatcher or an agreed downstream GRC and change workflow |
Integration and evidence design
The target design should identify which system owns source documents, obligations, actions, policies, controls and evidence. Depending on the agreed scope, exchange can use APIs, structured files or governed exports. Connector availability, direction, frequency and certification must be confirmed in discovery; this page does not claim a universal certified integration list.
- Preserve the source URL or document, publication and effective dates, captured version and relevant paragraph.
- Record whether text was machine-extracted, edited, approved or rejected and by whom.
- Retain applicability rationale, comments, approval state and timestamps.
- Export a controlled requirement record without losing the source citation.
Public product view
Built for governed use of AI
RegReview is designed around human review and traceability. AI-generated extraction or classification is not treated as a final legal conclusion. Each material decision can retain its source, rationale, reviewer and approval history.
RegReview and RegMatcher
RegReview answers, “What changed, what does it require and who is affected?” RegMatcher answers, “Which policies and controls cover it, where are the gaps and what must be remediated?” The modules share a requirements model so the handoff does not depend on another spreadsheet export.
Frequently asked questions
Does RegReview provide legal advice?
No. It supports source monitoring, extraction, comparison, workflow and evidence. Qualified legal and compliance reviewers remain responsible for interpretation and applicability decisions.
Can teams start with a limited set of regulators?
Yes. A focused pilot can begin with a defined jurisdiction, regulator or topic and expand after the review taxonomy and ownership model are validated.
Can RegReview track internal policy changes?
RegReview focuses on regulatory intake and requirements. RegMatcher connects confirmed requirements to internal policies, controls and evidence.
Product boundaries
Source coverage, update frequency and connector availability depend on the agreed implementation scope. Confirm those details during discovery before treating any source list as complete.